ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Gender Differences in Prognosis of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on the SEER Database.
Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: Toward Prognostic Precision in the Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionWhile gender is a known prognostic factor for many cancers, its specific role in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) survival remains poorly characterized. This study aimed to investigate gender-based differences in PanNETs prognosis using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with PanNETs between the years 2000 and 2020, extracted from the SEER database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to mitigate potential selection bias. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression.ResultsAmong the 5155 patients included (2814 males, 2341 females), males showed significantly worse OS than females both before (hazard ratio [HR] 1.29, 95% CI 1.14-1.47,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.