ArticleCell reports methods2026
Dissecting novel object exploration in a fully automated homecage-based novel object recognition test.
Article in Cell reports methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The novel object recognition (NOR) test is widely used to assess memory in rodents, offering strong ethological validity, cross-species relevance, and specificity for hippocampal-parahippocampal function. However, standard implementations are often confounded by uncontrolled factors. Here, we present a fully automated, homecage-based NOR test for evaluating long-term object memory in mice. Our empirically informed computational model demonstrates the robustness of this approach despite uncertainties in defining exploratory behavior. Mice reliably preferred novel over familiar objects after both 24-h and 7-day delays, with recognition emerging already at a distance. Results were replicated across two facilities. Notably, recognition after 24 h depended on prior interactions with the replaced object, but not after 7 days. We also show that external factors can bias exploration, which can be mitigated using relative discrimination measures. This automated paradigm enhances standardization, reproducibility, and our understanding of the factors influencing object exploratory behaviors and object memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.