Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41544624›Full record

ArticleCell reports methods2026

Dissecting novel object exploration in a fully automated homecage-based novel object recognition test.

Hinze Ho, Nejc Kejzar, Stephen Burton, Loukia Katsouri, Marino Krstulovic, Eszter Sara Arany, John O'Keefe, Marius Bauza, Julija Krupic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hinze HoUK Dementia Research Institute at University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK.
Nejc KejzarDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK.
Stephen BurtonSainsbury Wellcome Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University College London, London, W1T 4JG, UK.
Loukia KatsouriSainsbury Wellcome Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University College London, London, W1T 4JG, UK.
Marino KrstulovicUK Dementia Research Institute at University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK.
Eszter Sara AranyDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK.
John O'KeefeSainsbury Wellcome Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University College London, London, W1T 4JG, UK; Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Marius BauzaSainsbury Wellcome Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University College London, London, W1T 4JG, UK. Electronic address: m.bauza@ucl.ac.uk.
Julija KrupicUK Dementia Research Institute at University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK; Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK. Electronic address: j.krupic@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The novel object recognition (NOR) test is widely used to assess memory in rodents, offering strong ethological validity, cross-species relevance, and specificity for hippocampal-parahippocampal function. However, standard implementations are often confounded by uncontrolled factors. Here, we present a fully automated, homecage-based NOR test for evaluating long-term object memory in mice. Our empirically informed computational model demonstrates the robustness of this approach despite uncertainties in defining exploratory behavior. Mice reliably preferred novel over familiar objects after both 24-h and 7-day delays, with recognition emerging already at a distance. Results were replicated across two facilities. Notably, recognition after 24 h depended on prior interactions with the replaced object, but not after 7 days. We also show that external factors can bias exploration, which can be mitigated using relative discrimination measures. This automated paradigm enhances standardization, reproducibility, and our understanding of the factors influencing object exploratory behaviors and object memory.

Indexed as

Exploratory BehaviorRecognition, PsychologyAnimalsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLautomated novel object recognitionCP: neurosciencehomecage cognitive testingobject memory

Identifiers

PMID41544624
PMCPMC12853181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.