ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
Development of Venous Thromboembolism Risk Prediction Models Based on Whole Blood Gene Expression Profiling Using 20 Machine Learning Algorithms: Comprehensive Analysis Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is a lack of venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk prediction models based on gene expression information. Objective: This study aimed to construct a VTE prediction model based on whole blood gene expression profiling, by performing a comprehensive analysis of 20 machine learning (ML) algorithms. Methods: Two transcriptome datasets containing patients with VTE and healthy controls were obtained by searching the Gene Expression Omnibus database and used as the training and validation sets, respectively. Feature selection for model construction was performed on the training set using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and random forest, followed by the selection of the intersection of the chosen features. Subsequently, recursive feature elimination was applied to further refine the selected features. The selected features underwent model construction using 20 ML algorithms. The performance of the models was evaluated using various methods such as receiver operating characteristic and confusion matrix. The validation set was used for external model validation. Results: The final results demonstrated that all algorithm models, except for k-nearest neighbor, exhibited good performance in VTE prediction. External validation data indicated that 9 algorithm models had an area under the curve greater than 0.75. The confusion matrix analysis revealed that the algorithm models maintained high specificity in the external validation cohort. Conclusions: This study used 20 ML algorithms to construct VTE prediction models based on whole blood gene expression information, with 9 of these models demonstrating good diagnostic performance in external validation cohorts. The above models, when used in conjunction with D-dimer, may provide more valuable references for VTE diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.