ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2026
Myxovirus resistance protein A to differentiate between viral and non-viral respiratory infections in adults: a prospective study.
Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Respiratory viral sepsis: rethinking fluid resuscitation and antibiotic stewardship.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the diagnostic utility of Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) in differentiating between viral and non-viral respiratory infections in adults.
methodsThis prospective, multicenter diagnostic accuracy study enrolled adults with acute respiratory infections (ARI) from outpatient and inpatient settings, alongside asymptomatic controls. Peripheral blood was collected for quantitative MxA measurement. Pathogen detection used targeted next-generation sequencing combined with conventional microbiological testing. Aetiological diagnoses were determined using standardized algorithms based on detected pathogens. The diagnostic accuracy of MxA for identifying viral ARIs was calculated.
resultsAmong 518 ARI patients, 325 had viral pathogens detected, 131 had bacterial/fungal pathogens, and 62 had no pathogen detected. Median MxA levels were significantly higher in viral (123.6 ng/ml; interquartile range [IQR], 56.4-189.6) than bacterial/fungal infections (15.9 ng/ml; IQR, 9.9-38.1; Bonferroni test
conclusionsMxA demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing between viral and non-viral respiratory infections in adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.