ArticleScience progress
Comparison of complications in open tracheostomy in patients taking low-dose aspirin.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThe use of aspirin in patients undergoing open tracheostomy is an issue for which there is still no clear conclusion. This uncertainty leads surgeons to make decisions based on the risks and benefits of continuing versus discontinuing aspirin. Therefore, this study aims to investigate complications related to aspirin use. The primary outcome was bleeding complications, while other complications were secondary outcomes.MethodsThis was a retrospective study compiling data from patients who underwent open tracheostomy at the Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn university and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, between January 2019 and December 2023. Demographic data, medical conditions, indications for tracheostomy, surgeon characteristics, operative time, aspirin use status, and complications were reviewed.ResultsThere were 47 patients in total in this study: 15 patients in the aspirin continuation group and 32 patients in the aspirin discontinuation group. In the aspirin continuation group, there were no major or minor bleeding events. In the discontinuation group, there were two cases of major bleeding and two cases of minor bleeding (an incidence of 6.3% for each), although the differences observed were not statistically significant. There were no other complications that showed statistically significant differences between the two groups.ConclusionThis study has shown that low-dose aspirin (81 mg) does not increase the risk of bleeding or other complications in patients who undergo open tracheostomy. These results support that the continuation of aspirin may be safe in patients undergoing this procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.