ArticlePloS one2026
Predicting grain growth kinetic in steels using machine learning and XAI for mechanical properties.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding and controlling grain growth kinetics in steels is crucial for optimizing mechanical properties during thermomechanical processing. However, traditional empirical models often fail to account for the complex, nonlinear interactions between alloying elements and processing parameters. In this study, we introduce a novel machine learning (ML) based framework that predicts austenitic grain growth behaviour directly from chemical composition and process conditions, utilizing a comprehensive dataset of 1039 experimentally validated samples. Among various algorithms tested, the XGBoost model demonstrated exceptional predictive capability, achieving an R2 value of 0.9728 after hyperparameter optimization. Feature selection methods (Pearson correlation, CfsSubset, ReliefF) and SHAP-based explainable AI analyses were employed to identify the most influential parameters, revealing temperature, initial grain size, and holding time as dominant factors. Experimental validation was conducted on 316L stainless steel samples annealed at 1100 °C. The predicted grain sizes showed strong agreement with experimental measurements, and the observed hardness variations followed the expected Hall-Petch behaviour. This study demonstrates the first integrated ML and experimental approach for predicting grain growth kinetics in steels, offering a powerful tool for alloy design and process optimization. Future work will extend this framework to additional process variables and alloy systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.