ArticlePloS one2026
"It's a last straw situation"; Overdose response and preferences for seeking support from emergency services during overdose in rural Ohio.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emergency preparedness planning: lessons from COVID-19 and the opioid crisis in rural Ohio.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWe assessed how people who use drugs in rural Ohio communities affected by the opioid epidemic respond to overdose, their preferences for seeking support from first responders, and factors contributing to their willingness or hesitancy to call 9-1-1 during an overdose. METHODOLOGY: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in select rural Ohio counties from 2021-2022 as part of the Ohio Opioid Project, one of eight sites in the Rural Opioid Initiative focused on overdose in the rural United States. Forty-four interviews with people who use drugs were coded using thematic analysis.
resultsMost participants had suffered an overdose (23/43) or witnessed (33/43) an overdose. Most participants preferred not to seek first responder support during an overdose if the victim was able to be revived. As a result, first responder support was not sought in most overdoses experienced or witnessed by participants. When first responders were called, outcomes varied: some participants felt the overdose victim's lives were saved, others felt stigmatized by first responders, and one was arrested by law enforcement at the scene. Among participants who preferred not to seek support from first responders, fear of arrest, hospitalization, and stigmatization were the main reasons. SIGNIFICANCE/CONTRIBUTION: This study details intervenable factors that could prevent overdoses from escalating to fatalities in rural Ohio, including: increasing awareness and knowledge for Good Samaritan Laws to encourage calls to 9-1-1 during overdose, ensuring unlawful arrests are not made at the scene of an overdose, and de-stigmatizing substance use among first responders and health care professionals. Findings may not be generalizable to the entire United States, but may have applicability in other rural, Appalachian areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.