Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41544070›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

"It's a last straw situation"; Overdose response and preferences for seeking support from emergency services during overdose in rural Ohio.

David C Colston, Vivian F Go, Clare Barrington, Adams L Sibley, Hannah M Piscalko, Laura Limarzi-Klyn, William C Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David C ColstonDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6393-4228
Vivian F GoDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Clare BarringtonDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Adams L SibleyDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Hannah M PiscalkoDivision of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Laura Limarzi-KlynDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
William C MillerDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1934-7827

Funding

From Biological to Social Processes: Interdisciplinary Training in Life Course ResearchT32HD091058 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT A HUMMER, Amanda L Thompson · 2017 to 2026
$4.3M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD091058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe assessed how people who use drugs in rural Ohio communities affected by the opioid epidemic respond to overdose, their preferences for seeking support from first responders, and factors contributing to their willingness or hesitancy to call 9-1-1 during an overdose. METHODOLOGY: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in select rural Ohio counties from 2021-2022 as part of the Ohio Opioid Project, one of eight sites in the Rural Opioid Initiative focused on overdose in the rural United States. Forty-four interviews with people who use drugs were coded using thematic analysis.

resultsMost participants had suffered an overdose (23/43) or witnessed (33/43) an overdose. Most participants preferred not to seek first responder support during an overdose if the victim was able to be revived. As a result, first responder support was not sought in most overdoses experienced or witnessed by participants. When first responders were called, outcomes varied: some participants felt the overdose victim's lives were saved, others felt stigmatized by first responders, and one was arrested by law enforcement at the scene. Among participants who preferred not to seek support from first responders, fear of arrest, hospitalization, and stigmatization were the main reasons. SIGNIFICANCE/CONTRIBUTION: This study details intervenable factors that could prevent overdoses from escalating to fatalities in rural Ohio, including: increasing awareness and knowledge for Good Samaritan Laws to encourage calls to 9-1-1 during overdose, ensuring unlawful arrests are not made at the scene of an overdose, and de-stigmatizing substance use among first responders and health care professionals. Findings may not be generalizable to the entire United States, but may have applicability in other rural, Appalachian areas.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseEmergency Medical ServicesAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOhioOpioid EpidemicRural PopulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41544070
PMCPMC12810844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.