Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41544068›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Exploring the Preferences and Behavioral Trends of e-Patients in Psychosomatics Towards Telemedicine During and Post COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Moritz Mahling, Alexander McQueeney, Teresa Festl-Wietek, Ken Masters, Stephan Zipfel, Anne Herrmann-Werner, Caroline Rometsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Moritz MahlingDeanery of Students' Affairs, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7960-4015
Alexander McQueeneyDeanery of Students' Affairs, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-6345-8832
Teresa Festl-WietekTübingen Institute for Medical Education (TIME), Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1450-1757
Ken MastersMedical Education and Informatics Department, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.ORCID 0000-0003-3425-5020
Stephan ZipfelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Osianderstr. 5, Tübingen, 72074, Germany, 49 7071 29-86719.ORCID 0000-0003-1659-4440
Anne Herrmann-WernerTübingen Institute for Medical Education (TIME), Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2413-7047
Caroline RometschDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Osianderstr. 5, Tübingen, 72074, Germany, 49 7071 29-86719.ORCID 0000-0002-3172-0823

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 accelerated the adoption of health services, with a growing number of psychosomatic patients turning to the internet for health-related decisions. This study explored changes in communication behavior, information-seeking habits, and post-pandemic consultation preferences among psychosomatic patients during and after COVID-19. Objective: This study explored changes in communication behavior, information-seeking habits, and post-pandemic consultation preferences among psychosomatic patients during and after COVID-19. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 150 adult patients (>18 y) from the psychosomatic outpatient department in Tübingen, Germany, were invited to complete an ad hoc questionnaire to identify e-patients' preferences related to communication, information-seeking behavior, subjective explanations, and postpandemic preferences. Group comparisons and multiple linear regression analyses were conducted. Results: The study revealed a slight increase in online-based communication between patients and caregivers (eg, caregivers' system use +10.8%; live video consultations +30.8%), as well as in patient-patient interactions (eg, online correspondence +16.9%). Significant group differences were observed for social media correspondence by patient age (χ2¬=17.44, P<.001) and for live video consultations by gender (χ2¬=70.17, P<.001). For both age and gender, significant group differences were found in the use of medical videos (age χ2¬=6.36, P=.04; gender χ2¬=76.70, P<.001). Age, gender, and preferences for live video consultations were identified as significant predictors (F1,11=14.195, P<.001, R²=0.299) of patients' future preferences for on-site versus online consultations. Conclusions: Although a slight increase in online-based communication was observed, resilience in patient-caregiver and patient-patient communication indicated relative stability under challenging circumstances. Older adults and female patients expressed a preference for on-site consultations, emphasizing the significance of in-person care. Male patients demonstrated greater openness towards online consultations, indicating potential for expansion of eHealth services. Identifying preferences is a core essential for providing future eHealth implementations that account for diverse patient needs and for designing care offerings. Incorporating these findings may enhance patient engagement and satisfaction in the evolving landscape of eHealth services for better health care outcomes.

Indexed as

COVID-19Patient PreferenceTelemedicineAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansInformation Seeking BehaviorInternetMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPsychosomatic MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19eHealthe-patientgender differencespandemicpreferences

Identifiers

PMID41544068
PMCPMC12810746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.