Trial reportCerebrovascular diseases extra2026
Glyceryl Trinitrate versus Sham in the Treatment of Hyperacute Stroke: The Efficacy of Nitric Oxide in Stroke-2 (ENOS-2) Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Cerebrovascular diseases extra, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Glyceryl Trinitrate versus Sham in the Treatment of Hyperacute Stroke: The Efficacy of Nitric Oxide in Stroke-2 (ENOS-2) Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial.Cerebrovascular diseases extra · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHigh blood pressure (BP) is associated with a poor outcome after stroke. Trials of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), a nitric oxide donor, have suggested that treatment between 3 and 5 h might improve functional outcome.
methodsWe randomly assigned hospitalised patients with an acute ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke to 2 days of transdermal GTN (5 mg/day) or sham, started between 3 and 5 h after onset. The primary feasibility outcome was recruitment rate; proof-of-concept (PoC) was assessed at 90 days by central observers blinded to treatment assignment using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Data are number (%), median [interquartile range], or mean (standard deviation). Comparisons were assessed by multiple linear regression.
resultsThirty-nine of an intended 120 participants were recruited. A total of 3,314 people were excluded, commonly related to presentation >5 h of onset or outside of researcher working hours, no eligible symptoms/signs or an unclear onset time. Mean age was 72 (SD 13) years, females were 41%, BP was 161.8 (18.4)/80.8 (14.9) mm Hg, and time from onset at baseline was 216 [186, 251] minutes. The fall in BP over 24 h did not differ between GTN versus sham. mRS at 3 months did not differ between the groups (difference in means, DIM -0.20, 95% confidence intervals -1.30, 0.90; p = 0.72). GTN was associated with improved cognition on the telephone interview of cognition scale (DIM 8.0, 95% CI 1.3, 14.8; p = 0.020). Although headache was more common, GTN was associated with fewer serious adverse events (p = 0.020).
conclusionRecruitment limitations in this small single-centre trial prevented demonstration of feasibility for patients in the time window of 3-5 h post ictus. GTN demonstrated some evidence of PoC and was safe. A multicentre trial needs to further test this hypothesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.