Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41543938›Full record

ArticleCell reports2026

From comparative connectomics to large-scale working memory modeling in macaque and marmoset.

Loïc Magrou, Panagiota Theodoni, Amy F T Arnsten, Marcello G P Rosa, Xiao-Jing Wang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Loïc MagrouCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA; Department of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; Grossman Center for Quantitative Biology and Human Behavior, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Panagiota TheodoniDepartment of Philosophy, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 84 Athens, Greece; Department of Psychology, Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, 176 71 Athens, Greece; College Year in Athens, 116 35 Athens, Greece; Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, Nicosia 2231, Cyprus.
Amy F T ArnstenDepartment of Neuroscience, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Marcello G P RosaDepartment of Physiology and Neuroscience Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.
Xiao-Jing WangCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA. Electronic address: xjwang@nyu.edu.

Funding

Recurrent Neual Circuit Basis of Time Integration and Decision MakingR01MH062349 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, XIAO-JING · 2001 to 2022
$7.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH062349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although macaques and marmosets are both primates of choice for studying the brain mechanisms of cognition, they differ in key aspects of anatomy and behavior. Interestingly, a recent connectomic analysis revealed that strong top-down projections from the prefrontal cortex to the posterior parietal cortex, present in macaques and important for executive function, are absent in marmosets. Here, we propose a consensus mapping that bridges the two species' cortical atlases and allows for direct area-to-area comparison of their connectomes, which are then used to build comparative computational large-scale modeling of the frontoparietal circuit for working memory. The macaque model exhibits resilience against distractors, a prerequisite for normal working memory function. By contrast, the marmoset model predicts a sensitivity to distractibility commonly observed behaviorally in this species. Surprisingly, this contrasting trend can be swapped by rescaling intrafrontal and frontoparietal connection weights and offers a credible prediction to the marmoset's behavior in this specific task.

Indexed as

CallithrixConnectomeMacacaMemory, Short-TermModels, NeurologicalAnimalsPrefrontal CortexanatomyconnectomeconsensusCP: neurosciencelarge-scale modelingmacaquemarmosetworking memory

Identifiers

PMID41543938
PMCPMC12962313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.