ArticleCell reports2026
From comparative connectomics to large-scale working memory modeling in macaque and marmoset.
Article in Cell reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Widespread Corticothalamic Connectivity Identifies the Inferior Pulvinar as a Central Node in Visual Network Architecture.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Prefrontal contributions to the executive control of visuospatial working memory across primate species.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2026Review
- Higher dopamine D1 receptor expression in prefrontal parvalbumin neurons underlies higher distractibility in marmosets versus macaques.Communications biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although macaques and marmosets are both primates of choice for studying the brain mechanisms of cognition, they differ in key aspects of anatomy and behavior. Interestingly, a recent connectomic analysis revealed that strong top-down projections from the prefrontal cortex to the posterior parietal cortex, present in macaques and important for executive function, are absent in marmosets. Here, we propose a consensus mapping that bridges the two species' cortical atlases and allows for direct area-to-area comparison of their connectomes, which are then used to build comparative computational large-scale modeling of the frontoparietal circuit for working memory. The macaque model exhibits resilience against distractors, a prerequisite for normal working memory function. By contrast, the marmoset model predicts a sensitivity to distractibility commonly observed behaviorally in this species. Surprisingly, this contrasting trend can be swapped by rescaling intrafrontal and frontoparietal connection weights and offers a credible prediction to the marmoset's behavior in this specific task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.