Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41543899›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Spatial clustering modifies competition in a diverse annual plant community.

Theo L Gibbs, Zachary J Gold, Haylee Oyler, Jonathan M Levine, Nathan J B Kraft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Spatial clustering modifies competition in a diverse annual plant community.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Theo L Gibbs *Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0002-1515-8420
Zachary J Gold *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0001-5543-7574
Haylee OylerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.ORCID 0009-0008-2133-3708
Jonathan M Levine *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0003-2857-7904
Nathan J B Kraft *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.ORCID 0000-0001-8867-7806

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) DEB-2022213National Science Foundation (NSF) DEB-2022810NSF | National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) DGE-2444107PU | High Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton University (HMEI) Mary and Randall Hack '69 Research FundSchmidt Science Fellows N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial patterns are widespread in nature, and their formation has been studied extensively. However, the effects of spatial aggregation on the strength of species interactions are less well understood, especially in diverse ecological communities. In a field experiment with annual grassland plants in California, we manipulated the spatial arrangement-but not the number or identity-of two competitors and measured how they jointly affected a focal individual. We found that focal plants produced more seeds when their competitors were clustered than when they were mixed. These results suggest that mixed competitors generally had a more negative effect than clustered competitors. However, the effect of clustering varied across the pairs of competitor species. Competitor species that exhibited greater differences in size and/or functional traits across the spatial arrangements resulted in larger effects of clustering on focal plant seed production. Additionally, a competitive hierarchy among our study species predicted the effects of clustered versus mixed competitors on focal plant seed production. Altogether, our work suggests that the spatial arrangement of competitors changes the realized strength of competition in diverse plant communities. Given the extensive variation in spatial aggregation in plant communities, this mechanism is likely to be a powerful but underappreciated force shaping competition in nature.

Indexed as

EcosystemPlantsCaliforniaCluster AnalysisGrasslandSeedsSpecies Specificityannual plantsspatial patternsspecies aggregationspecies interactions

Identifiers

PMID41543899
PMCPMC12818405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.