Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41543897›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Predicting epistasis across proteins by structural logic.

Michelle Tang, Gareth A Cromie, Anowarul Kabir, Martin S Timour, Julee Ashmead, Russell S Lo, Nathaniel Corley, Frank DiMaio, Hiroki Morizono, Ljubica Caldovic and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Michelle TangPacific Northwest Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98122.ORCID 0000-0002-8779-8697
Gareth A CromiePacific Northwest Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98122.
Anowarul KabirDepartment of Computer Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030.ORCID 0000-0001-8060-2084
Martin S TimourPacific Northwest Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98122.ORCID 0000-0001-7372-9343
Julee AshmeadPacific Northwest Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98122.ORCID 0009-0001-6084-1851
Russell S LoPacific Northwest Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98122.
Nathaniel CorleyInstitute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98185.ORCID 0000-0002-6509-7144
Frank DiMaioInstitute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98185.ORCID 0000-0002-7524-8938
Hiroki MorizonoCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's National Research Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC 20012.ORCID 0000-0002-9678-5564
Ljubica CaldovicCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's National Research Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC 20012.
Nicholas Ah MewCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's National Research Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC 20012.
Andrea GropmanDepartment of Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105.ORCID 0000-0002-2106-6776
Amarda ShehuDepartment of Computer Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030.ORCID 0000-0001-5230-4610
Aimée M DudleyPacific Northwest Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98122.ORCID 0000-0003-3644-0625

Funding

INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN GENOMIC SCIENCEST32HG000035 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Bruce Colston Trapnell · 1995 to 2026
$24.2M
Development and application of variant interpretation platforms to advance detection of urea cycle disorders by newborn genome sequencingR01HD114863 · NICHD · PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI AIMEE M DUDLEY, Andrea Lynne Gropman · 2024 to 2026
$2.4M
Comprehensive approaches for understanding the functional impact of genetic variation and genetic complexityR01GM134274 · NIGMS · PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI DUDLEY, AIMEE M · 2019 to 2022
$2.3M
HHS | NIH | Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) R01HD114863HHS | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) R01GM134274NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000035NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD114863NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM134274NSF (NSF) 2310113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately predicting the phenotypic consequences of genetic variation is a major challenge for precision medicine. The problem is exacerbated by epistatic interactions, nonadditive effects between genetic variants that produce unexpected phenotypes. Here, we explore an understudied form of positive epistasis: intragenic complementation, in which pairs of loss-of-function variants restore near wild-type protein function. Using mutational scanning in yeast, we identify thousands of such interactions in a clinically important enzyme, human argininosuccinate lyase (ASL). Restoration of protein function is not due to the biochemical properties of the substituted amino acids, but rather to a structural feature of the protein, the active site assembly. We develop a machine learning algorithm that uses protein language model embeddings to predict intragenic complementation in ASL with 99.6% accuracy. Additionally, the model trained on ASL generalizes to a structurally related but sequence-divergent enzyme, fumarase, with accuracy over 90%. Our findings reveal a structural basis for this form of epistasis and provide a predictive framework that could extend to at least 4% of human proteins.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningModels, MolecularPrediction AlgorithmsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeepistasismachine learningvariant effects

Identifiers

PMID41543897
PMCPMC12818424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.