ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry letters2026
How Crystal Size and Number Steer Asymmetric Crystallization.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chiral amplification processes during crystallization can hinge on subtle asymmetries in crystal populations, yet the underlying kinetic drivers remain elusive. Here we experimentally investigate how size and mass imbalances between two enantiomeric crystal populations translate to asymmetric growth rates that determine asymmetric crystal growth. We find that the interplay between imbalances in size and mass can yield positive, linear or even negative nonlinear chiral amplification. Consequently, though small crystals have a thermodynamically higher solubility than large ones, a minority population of small crystals can collectively outgrow and ultimately dominate a majority of larger crystals. This amplification due to size effects can be further enhanced or dampened by controlling growth rates. Our findings uncover an intricate kinetic selection mechanism driven by population-level growth rates and governed by fundamental crystallization dynamics. Together, these results provide new insights into the origin of nonlinear amplification phenomena and offer practical guidance for competitive asymmetric crystallization and self-assembly processes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.