Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41543832›Full record

ArticleXenotransplantation

Genomic Validation of PERV-C-Free Pigs to Support Xenotransplantation.

Neal R Benjamin, Giovanni Madrigal, Yasuko Ishida, Julian Catchen, Kari L Allen, Brent Pepin, Alfred L Roca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Xenotransplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Neal R BenjaminThe Program in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0856-7242
Giovanni MadrigalDepartment of Evolution, Ecology, and Behavior, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7006-0090
Yasuko IshidaDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8646-1291
Julian CatchenDepartment of Evolution, Ecology, and Behavior, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4798-660X
Kari L AllenCytotheryx, Inc., Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Brent PepinNational Pork Board, Des Moines, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5230-8299
Alfred L RocaThe Program in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9217-5593

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2025-67015-44928National Institute of Food and Agriculture ILLU-538-994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) are present in the germ lines of domesticated pigs (Sus scrofa) and related suids. There are three types of PERVs, PERV-A, -B, and -C, which differ in their host range. PERV-A and -B can infect human and porcine cells, while PERV-C only infects porcine cells. PERV-A and -B are found in the genomes of all pigs, while PERV-C is found in most but not all pigs. Although many PERV provirus insertions are defective, in vitro culture of porcine cells has produced infectious virions of all three types as well as PERV-A/C recombinants, which show enhanced replication competence. Identifying pigs that are PERV-C negative could help prevent such recombination events and would advance the development of porcine germplasm as a safer source of xenografts for humans. Here, we present the results of extensive screening involving 142 Landrace, Duroc, Large White, and crossbred pigs using up to nine primer pairs to identify putative PERV-C-negative animals. Long-read whole genome sequencing was conducted on a subset of four pigs (one PERV-C PCR positive and three PERV-C PCR putative negatives), which confirmed their status as PERV-C positive or negative, respectively. Our results confirmed that the screened pigs were truly PERV-C negative, establishing the existence of PERV-C-negative germplasm within the herd. These findings support the feasibility of developing or selecting PERV-C-negative pigs as a source of germplasm for xenotransplantation and other biomedical applications.

Indexed as

Endogenous RetrovirusesHeterograftsSus scrofaTransplantation, HeterologousAnimalsGenomicsHumansSwine

Identifiers

PMID41543832
PMCPMC12810672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.