ArticleGeroScience2026
Metacontrol-related aperiodic and periodic neural activity in cognitive aging: enhancing the neural signal-to-noise ratio through anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metacontrol, the ability to adapt cognitive control to task demands, declines with age and is thought to be reflected in aperiodic and periodic neural dynamics. Given that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) can modulate cortical excitability via membrane potential shifts, we tested whether atDCS alters the neurophysiological signatures of metacontrol in younger and older adults. In a mixed design, younger and older participants performed a Go/Nogo task under both atDCS and sham stimulation conditions; resting-state EEG data were also acquired. Aperiodic activity was analyzed using the FOOOF algorithm, and periodic activity was examined through time-frequency analysis. Behaviorally, younger adults showed higher accuracy and faster responses than older adults, but no significant stimulation effects emerged in either group. Results showed that, compared to sham, aperiodic activity (FOOOF exponent) increased after atDCS, particularly in older adults, indicating a steepening of the EEG spectrum and thus increased inhibitory tone in the aging process. However, resting-state aperiodic activity did not predict stimulation-induced effects within either group. In the periodic domain, we found no evidence that atDCS modulated task-related theta or alpha power. Moreover, exploratory analyses revealed no significant associations between atDCS-induced changes in the aperiodic exponent and oscillatory power. This dissociation indicates that, under the present conditions, the periodic and aperiodic components of the EEG signal reflect distinct and likely independent neurophysiological responses to neuromodulation. Targeting metacontrol mechanisms through neuromodulation may, with further validation, open new avenues for supporting cognitive health in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.