ArticleOral radiology2026
Regarding the paper "Evaluation of the effect of reducing metal artifacts in multi-detector CT imaging of zirconia and titanium implants" accepted: February 17, 2025.
Article in Oral radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
I am writing to raise concerns regarding the above-mentioned paper, specifically related to the phantom used in the study "Evaluation of the Effect of Reducing Metal Artifacts in Multi-Detector CT Imaging of Zirconia and Titanium Implants" Accepted: February 17, 2025 Oral Radiology https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-025-00814-5 ". In this paper, the authors state that they created a phantom that I designed and commissioned a specialist company to create. This phantom was designed for CBCT, not CT, and was designed by me to reflect the shape of the mandible to some extent in CT scans, while minimizing artifacts about 15 years ago. Our original paper was titled "Evaluation of Measurement Accuracy in Diagnostic Imaging Using Cone-Beam CT" and was published in the Journal of the Japanese Society of Oral Implantology (Yoshida Yuri, Morita Yasuhiko, et al., 2009; 22(1):3-14. It is available via open access. Subject: Concern Regarding the Paper "Evaluation of the Effect of Reducing Metal Artifacts in Multi-Detector CT Imaging of Zirconia and Titanium Implants" Accepted: February 17, 2025. I am writing to raise concerns regarding the above-mentioned paper, specifically related to the phantom used in the study. In this paper, the authors state that they created a phantom that I designed and commissioned a specialist company to create. This phantom was designed for CBCT, not CT, and was designed by me to reflect the shape of the mandible to some extent in CBCT Images, while minimizing artifacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41543806What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.