ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2026
Impact of bedside ultrasound-informed cardiopulmonary resuscitation on the quality and prognosis of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in cardiac arrest patients.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective cohort study, conducted between December 2022 and December 2023, aims to observe the efficacy of bedside ultrasound-informed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in determining the possible etiology of cardiac arrest, increase the success rate of CPR, shorten the recovery of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) time, and improve the prognosis. The patients were placed into two groups: ultrasound and conventional, to find the causes of cardiac arrest and promptly address them. The differences in the discovery rate of the possible causes of cardiac arrest, CPR success rate, and ROSC time between the two groups of patients were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The effect of the right-sided peak systolic velocity (PSV) of the common carotid artery (CCA) (CCA-PSV) on the success rate of CPR was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The difference between the mean hospital stay and 28-day survival rate of the two groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The use of bedside ultrasound-informed CPR can help in determining the possible causes of cardiac arrest in some patients and can improve the success rate of CPR and shorten the time of ROSC. However, there was no significant difference in shortening the mean hospital stay and increasing the 28-day survival rate. A correlation was noted between the right-sided CCA-PSV and the CPR success rate and ROSC time in patients in the ultrasound group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41543793What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.