ArticleFish physiology and biochemistry2026
Transcriptome and DNA methylation responses in the liver of Megalobrama amblycephala under hypoxia and heat stress.
Article in Fish physiology and biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Global warming and aquaculture expansion are raising water temperatures and decreasing dissolved oxygen (DO) in freshwater environments, threatening fish survival. Revealing the molecular mechanisms of fish response to heat and/or hypoxia is vital for the development of sustainable aquaculture and genetic breeding strategies. This study examined the molecular adaptations of Megalobrama amblycephala, an important economic fish in China, to environmental stresses. Liver samples from fish subjected to hypoxia (LO), heat (HT), and their combination (HL) were analyzed using transcriptome and whole-genome methylation sequencing. Results indicated that environmental stresses significantly altered gene expression and DNA methylation levels in M. amblycephala, suggesting a molecular basis for enhanced environmental adaptability through metabolic regulation. Comparative analysis showed distinct differences in differentially expressed genes (DEGs) across the three stress groups, with the highest number occurring in the NC vs HL group, indicating a stronger transcriptional response. PPI analysis revealed significant alterations in metabolic pathway gene expression. Examination of the PPI network constructed from DEGs common to all stress groups pinpointed core metabolic regulators, such as the upregulated hk1 and aldoaa and the downregulated gck and fasn, highlighting a coordinated cellular metabolic adaptation to environmental stresses. DNA methylation analysis revealed CG-type methylation as the predominant pattern. The HL group exhibited elevated CHH and CHG methylation compared to other groups. Integration of DMR-promoter genes and DEGs yielded 12, 8, and 29 overlapping genes in the NC vs LO, NC vs HT, and NC vs HL groups, respectively. KEGG analysis of negatively regulated overlapping genes showed significantly enriched pathways: TGF-beta signaling pathway and endocytosis in the NC vs LO group; galactose metabolism and amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism in the NC vs HT group; and other glycan degradation and various types of N-glycan biosynthesis in the NC vs HL group. These findings indicated that the adaptation of M. amblycephala to environmental changes is driven by coordinated changes in specific gene methylation and transcription levels, thereby fine-tuning physiological processes including intracellular signaling, glucose and glycoconjugate metabolism. These findings provide theoretical support for optimizing cultivation strategies of M. amblycephala.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41543774What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.