Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41543676›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2026

Coal fly ash industrial waste-derived products: a review on the extraction of aluminum and silicon for nanoparticle synthesis.

Ntombiphumile Perceverence Tenza, Mathibela Elias Aphane

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ntombiphumile Perceverence TenzaUniversity of South Africa - Florida Campus, Roodepoort, Gauteng, South Africa.
Mathibela Elias AphaneUniversity of South Africa - Florida Campus, Roodepoort, Gauteng, South Africa. Aphanme@unisa.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5957-5920

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

C oal fly ash (CFA), a common industrial by-product, poses both environmental challenges and opportunities as a secondary source of silicon and aluminum. This review critically evaluates extraction methods for these elements, focusing on efficiency, selectivity, and scalability. Sintering techniques enhance aluminum recovery by decomposing stable aluminosilicate phases but generally fail to extract silicon, requiring high energy input and large chemical volumes and generating substantial secondary waste. Direct acid leaching selectively dissolves aluminum, often achieving extraction efficiencies above 80%, though crystalline phases such as mullite remain largely unreactive. Alkaline leaching and alkali fusion improve solubilization of both aluminum and silicon, particularly targeting refractory quartz and mullite, but frequently favor silicate recovery and involve significant reagent consumption. Hybrid and combined approaches, including sequential acid-alkali leaching and hydrothermal treatments, achieve more balanced recovery of Al and Si, with moderate to high efficiencies (up to 98%), and reduce energy and chemical demand. Despite progress, most recoveries are still moderate, impurities persist, and scalable, standardized protocols are lacking. While CFA-derived silica nanoparticles are increasingly studied, sustainable alumina nanoparticle synthesis and broader applications remained underexplored. Limited research in regions such as South Africa further restricts local adaptation. Thus, the review highlights the importance of integrated, eco-friendly, and region-specific strategies, reporting both elemental and oxide-based data to enable meaningful comparison and guide future CFA valorization.

Indexed as

AluminumCoal AshIndustrial WasteNanoparticlesSiliconAluminumCoal AshIndustrial WasteSiliconAluminumCoal fly ashExtractionNanoparticlesSiliconWaste valorization

Identifiers

PMID41543676
PMCPMC12891058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.