SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026
A systematic review with meta-analysis of the olfactory fossa anatomy: Implications for anterior skull base approaches.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe anterior cranial fossa, and specifically the olfactory fossa (OF), is a region of critical importance in skull base surgery due to its complex and variable anatomy.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the depth of the OF based on the Keros (1962) classification system and to estimate the pooled prevalence of each type.
resultsA total of 40 imaging-based studies involving 17,078 skull sides were included. The pooled mean OF depth was 4.99 mm, corresponding to Keros type II, which was also the most common type with a prevalence of 66.13%, followed by type I at 22.50% and type III at 9.15%. Anatomical variation was influenced by geographical distribution, imaging modality, and age group.
conclusionsThe findings underscore the need for thorough preoperative imaging, as the identification of OF depth, symmetry, and surrounding anatomical features is essential for safe endoscopic and transcranial approaches. The study emphasizes the relevance of incorporating evidence-based anatomical knowledge into surgical planning to minimize the risk of complications such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage and intracranial injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41543618What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.