ReviewMikrochimica acta2026
Breaking the snapshot barrier: electrochemical biosensors for real-time in-vivo abscisic acid (ABA) tracking in dynamic environments.
Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abscisic acid (ABA) is a key phytohormone that regulates plant responses to abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, and cold, serving as an important biomarker for plant health. Traditional ABA detection methods, primarily chromatographic and immunoassay-based, are invasive, labor-intensive, and unsuitable for continuous monitoring in natural growth conditions. Wearable sensors offer a promising solution for in situ, non-destructive, and real-time monitoring of plant stress responses. This manuscript highlights the advantages of electrochemical sensing platforms over physical and electrophysiological modalities for direct hormone detection. Moreover, this manuscript discusses material considerations, including biocompatibility, molecular specificity, mechanical flexibility, and environmental resilience, which are critical for reliable field deployment. Recent advances in molecularly imprinted polymers, hydrogel-based interfaces, and nanomaterial composites such as graphene and carbon nanotubes are evaluated for their potential to enhance sensitivity and selectivity. Challenges, including sensor stability, interference from complex plant matrices, and integration with low-power electronics, are also addressed. Continuous, real-time data from wearable sensors provides a dynamic view of plant stress, surpassing conventional snapshot measurements. Furthermore, advances in flexible electronics and miniaturization enable seamless integration with plant tissues without causing damage. Finally, this manuscript focuses on future research directions on hybrid sensor design, wireless communication, and AI-driven analytics to enable high-resolution monitoring of plant stress (ABA). Wearable electrochemical sensors thus hold transformative potential for precision agriculture, supporting proactive crop management and sustainable farming practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41543591What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.