ReviewEuropean radiology2026
A new framework for pulmonary nodules: how terminology impacts management.
Review in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Fleischner Society recently updated its Glossary of Terms of Thoracic Imaging, proposing a new approach in the assessment of pulmonary nodules. These updates include changes in terminology regarding the definition of nodule size, as well as inclusive terminology to provide a more flexible framework in the assessment of pulmonary nodule morphology. The broad categories "simple" and "complex" are introduced for more versatile characterization to encompass the wide nodule structure and morphology we see in clinical practice, beyond the classic trichotomy of solid, subsolid, and part-solid. Another key aspect in the assessment of pulmonary nodules includes longitudinal evaluation, a small part of which is growth, namely changes in nodule size. While there is a strong focus on changes in size, other features, such as changes in components, also play a key role in nodule assessment. These include transition in morphology and structure: from simple to complex, and complex to simple; in regard not only to the core of the nodule, but also to borders and contours. This paper examines how the updated terminology aligns with and impacts management within the current nodule management paradigms. KEY POINTS: Question The updated Fleischner Society Glossary of Terms introduces a new definition for nodule size and terminology regarding nodule morphology, and these features are tied to management. Findings Nodule size and morphology are important factors in characterizing and assessing the malignant potential of pulmonary nodules. Clinical relevance The increased threshold for nodule size aims to decrease the workup of small, likely benign nodules. New terminology on morphology allows more flexible characterization to address the broad range seen in clinical practice and offers an opportunity for incorporation in nodule management systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41543561What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.