Observational studyEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026
Effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in inpatients with selective mutism compared to social anxiety disorder: an observational study.
Observational study in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Youth with selective mutism: a nationwide patient registry study.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Selective Mutism (SM) is a rare childhood anxiety disorder characterized by a persistent inability to speak in specific social settings despite adequate speaking ability in others, sharing etiological and clinical overlap with Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD). While evidence for pharmacological treatment in SM is limited, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have demonstrated potential efficacy, but studies on effectiveness in routine clinical practice are lacking. This single-center, retrospective observational study analysed data from 2011 to 2021 on children aged 4-14 years with SM or SAD treated as inpatients at a German university hospital. The mean age at admission was 11.9 years in both groups. Using propensity score matching and statistical modelling, we compared SSRI prescription patterns, dosage, and duration of inpatient/day-care treatment (DOT) between groups. In the SM group, we additionally tested for differences in speaking pattern at discharge comparing children with and without SSRI medication. SSRI treatment was more frequent in SM (75.4%) than in SAD (55.0%, p = 0.011). Adjusted for pattern of additional internalizing, externalizing and specific developmental disorders, no main effects of group (SM versus SAD), nor of SSRI treatment or dosage between and across groups were found on DOT. In the SM group, SSRI treatment was associated with more strongly improved speaking pattern at discharge compared to treatment without SSRI (p = 0.009). Results are discussed in relation to optimal dosage and effectiveness of SSRI treatment on improved speaking pattern in SM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.