ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Long-Term Outcomes of Atrial Septal Defect Closure in Adults Older than 50 Years.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There remains ambiguity regarding the benefits of atrial septal defect (ASD) closure in the elderly. This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of ASD closure in older patients. All adults aged 50 years and older who were diagnosed with ASD and right heart volume overload between 2010 and 2023 were considered for enrolment into this single-center observational study. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and non-fatal stroke. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, individual components of the primary outcome, heart failure hospitalization, NYHA functional class, and atrial arrhythmia. Three-hundred-eleven consecutive patients constituted the study cohort. 179 (57.6%) patients underwent transcatheter device closure, 85 (27.3%) underwent surgical closure and 47 (15.1%) patients opted for medical follow-up. The primary composite outcome was observed in 14 patients (29.8%) in those who did not undergo ASD closure as opposed to 41 patients (15.5%) in those who underwent ASD closure (p < 0.001) over a median follow-up period of 6.7 [3.2, 9.2] years. All-cause deaths and cardiovascular deaths were more frequently observed among those who remained on medical management than in those who underwent ASD closure. ASD closure in patients aged over 50 years conferred a significant benefit with respect to the composite outcome of cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI and non-fatal stroke. ASD closure in the elderly was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization rate, and improvement in functional class but did not reduce the incidence of arrhythmia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41543538What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.