ArticleCancer research communications2026
ctDNA Detected after Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Is Associated with Inferior Outcomes and May Inform Adjuvant Therapy.
Article in Cancer research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07565324 (Phase II Study of Ultrasound and ctDNA Guided Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Patients With HER2-positive Early Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase II Study of Ultrasound and ctDNA Guided Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Patients With HER2-positive Early Breast Cancer
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Circulating Tumor DNA and Circulating Tumor Cells in Liquid Biopsy as Post-Treatment Prognostic Biomarkers in Early Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Right-sizing treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer: evolving algorithms across the disease continuum.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Recurrence in Real Time: Rethinking Breast Cancer Follow-Up Evaluation with Circulating Tumor DNA.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Evolution of the Use of Circulating DNA as a Biomarker in Neoadjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- A Novel Biological Index for Predicting Neoadjuvant Treatment Response in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: The Tumor-Immune-Proliferation-Inflammation (TIPI) Score.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Integration of Nanotechnology with ctDNA: New Advances for Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Circulating tumor DNA in neoadjuvant therapy for solid tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- MRI-guided de-escalation in HER2-positive early breast cancer: precision progress with necessary prudence.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
ctDNA has been reported as a predictor of the progression of metastatic breast cancer and recurrence in early breast cancer (EBC). This study explored whether ctDNA persistence in patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) EBC who achieved pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) indicates a poor prognosis and the need for adjuvant T-DM1. Of the 117 patients enrolled, 25 patients achieved pCR after NAT and 92 patients did not. Six of the 25 pCR patients showed positive ctDNA after NAT, whereas 26 of the 92 non-pCR patients were ctDNA-positive. Eighteen patients received adjuvant T-DM1, whereas 99 patients did not. Among the non-T-DM1 group, ctDNA positivity after NAT independently predicted recurrence (HR, 5.505; 95% confidence interval, 1.950-15.540; P = 0.001). pCR patients with ctDNA positivity experienced a shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared with pCR and ctDNA-negative patients after NAT(P = 0.008), whereas non-pCR patients with ctDNA-negative tumors had a better RFS compared with non-pCR patients with ctDNA-positive status (P = 0.001). In the 79 patients who were ctDNA-positive before NAT, clearance of ctDNA by NAT was associated with significantly better RFS than nonclearance (P < 0.001). Adjuvant T-DM1 also significantly improved the ctDNA clearance rate (P = 0.035) compared with non-T-DM1 therapy in patients with ctDNA positivity after NAT during serial tests. We classified the 117 patients as T-DM1/non-T-DM1 and ctDNA-positive/negative, and a significantly shorter RFS was observed in patients with ctDNA-positive/non-T-DM1 (P = 0.029) than in the other three patient groups. In conclusion, the presence of ctDNA after NAT in patients with HER2+ EBC is associated with a poor prognosis and may indicate adjuvant T-DM1. SIGNIFICANCE: Adjuvant T-DM1 can improve the survival of HER2+ EBC patients who don't achieve pCR. Our study showed that ctDNA positivity after NAT was associated with decreased RFS. ctDNA-positive status after NAT can be switched to ctDNA-negative status in patients treated with T-DM1. Patients who were ctDNA-positive and treated with T-DM1 had a similar RFS to those who were ctDNA-negative, indicating that "ctDNA positivity" could be a marker determining adjuvant T-DM1 therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.