ArticlemBio2026
Spatiotemporal patterns of airborne microbial communities in forest and grassland ecosystems.
Article in mBio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The atmosphere harbors a diverse and dynamic reservoir of microorganisms, yet their distribution in the atmosphere and response to environmental variation remains a subject of ongoing investigation. In this study, we compared airborne bacterial and fungal communities at subalpine forest (NWT) and steppe grassland (CPER) sites, over diel, vertical, and seasonal gradients. Air samples were collected at three heights over 4 months at NWT with concurrent sampling at CPER during two of those months. Fungal communities exhibited greater site-specific variability and sensitivity to environmental factors than bacterial communities, particularly at NWT, where vertical stratification and diel cycles significantly structured microbial diversity. In comparison, bacterial communities were temporally dynamic but showed weaker responses to local environmental conditions and minimal site-level differences. This may indicate broader dispersal and a ubiquitous set of bacterial taxa. Environmental drivers, such as atmospheric moisture and air pressure, strongly influenced microbial beta-diversity at NWT, while air temperature and wind speed impacted diversity at CPER, again highlighting ecosystem-specific responses. Despite compositional differences, a subset of shared bacterial and fungal ASVs was consistently detected across sites, with most shared ASVs detected at greater heights at NWT. This, along with wind patterns moving eastward from NWT toward CPER, indicates potential atmospheric transport between sites, with taxa dispersal being filtered by height. These results underscore the role of ecosystem structure, meteorological conditions, and air mass movement in shaping the aerobiome and suggest that airborne microbial communities are shaped by both local emission and long-range atmospheric transport processes.IMPORTANCEUnderstanding the drivers of airborne microbial community structure is essential for predicting microbial dispersal, ecosystem connectivity, and responses to environmental change. This study reveals that atmospheric fungal and bacterial communities are shaped by distinct ecological and environmental factors, with fungi exhibiting stronger site-specific responses and vertical stratification than bacteria. The contrasting patterns between subalpine forest and grassland ecosystems underscore how local conditions influence microbial diversity and transport potential. Importantly, the detection of shared taxa, especially at greater sampling heights, suggests that atmospheric transport may connect distant ecosystems and that certain taxa are ubiquitous. These findings highlight the complexity of the aerobiome and its sensitivity to spatial and temporal dynamics, providing new insights into microbial distribution and the role of the atmosphere in microbial exchange across landscapes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.