ArticleThe plant genome2026
Effectiveness of low-density high-throughput marker platform and easy-to-measure traits for genomic prediction of biomass yield in oat (Avena sativa L.).
Article in The plant genome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncovering the genetic architecture of biomass yield and related traits in Southern US oat germplasm using genome-wide association study.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of low-density high-throughput marker platform and easy-to-measure traits for genomic prediction of biomass yield in oat (Avena sativa L.).The plant genome · 2026Article
- Genome-wide association study uncovers the genetic basis of stem rust resistance in the southern US oat (Avena sativa L.) germplasm at different growth stages.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Genomic prediction for stem rust resistance in the southern United States elite oat (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) is a promising strategy for accelerating genetic gains of complex traits in breeding programs. Despite the recent advancements in high-throughput genotyping technologies, the selection of the type of marker systems needed for GS remains challenging in breeding programs. In this study, we explored 3K array single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and genotyping by sequencing (GBS) SNP markers for genomic prediction of oat biomass yield using different statistical and machine learning approaches. An oat panel consisting of 420 lines was phenotyped for biomass-related traits for 3 years and genotyped using two different marker platforms (3K array and GBS). Our results showed similar performance of both the 3K array and GBS-based SNPs in terms of training population optimization, forward prediction, and univariate and multivariate genomic prediction of forage yield. The genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), Bayes-B, and random forest models gave similar predictive ability for dry matter yield (DMY) in different harvest-year combinations and for both marker platforms. The multivariate models involving various combinations of secondary traits (simple breeders' field notes and data) resulted in more than twofold increases in predictive abilities compared to the univariate models. Comparison of the 25% top-performing observed and predicted genotypes showed a higher overlap percentage (30.10%-66.99%) for multivariate GBLUP models compared to the univariate models (27.18%-51.46%). This further elucidates the great potential of multivariate GS models incorporating the more robust and easily reproducible 3K array SNP markers for improving the genetic gains of DMY in breeding programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.