ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2026
Acceptability of Using Large Language Models to Support Smoking Cessation Attempts: a Qualitative Study Among African Americans Who Smoke.
Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAfrican Americans face significant disparities in tobacco-related diseases and access to smoking cessation resources. Digital health interventions using large language models (LLMs) show promise in increasing engagement and successful quit attempts. However, impressions regarding acceptability of LLM-based interventions among African Americans are unknown and evidence suggests such interventions require tailoring for underserved communities. Our goal was to evaluate perceptions of LLM-based interventions among African Americans to inform development of an LLM-based chatbot to support quit attempts.
methodsWe conducted remote focus groups with adult African Americans residing in Minnesota who smoke cigarettes to determine acceptability of LLM-based health interventions and inform the functionality of an LLM-based chatbot supporting quit attempts. Discussions followed a structured guide and were recorded to facilitate analysis. Transcripts were coded independently by two analysts with a shared codebook.
results21 adults participated in focus group discussions. 57.1% of participants were female and the mean age was 45.6 (SD, 10.5). Three themes united participants' feedback: (1) participants limited familiarity with LLM and related AI technology, (2) willingness to use an LLM-based app to support quit attempts, and (3) perceptions of features that impact the acceptability of an LLM-based chatbot to support quit attempts.
conclusionAfrican Americans have complex perceptions and expectations regarding the use of LLMs to deliver health interventions. While many recognize the potential benefits, significant concerns and knowledge gaps remain. To build trust and acceptability, intervention developers should prioritize community engagement and ethical guidelines to ensure that LLM-driven solutions are inclusive and effective for multiple communities. IMPLICATIONS: Large language models and related AI technologies have shown promise for improving access and engagement when deployed through digital health interventions. Focus groups with African Americans who smoke combustible cigarettes revealed factors impacting the acceptability in using LLM-based interventions to support quit attempts. Efforts to build digital health interventions should prioritize community engagement to reduce apprehensions and improve alignment with community needs and values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.