ArticleAnnals of botany2026
Floral syndromes in Aquilegia (Ranunculaceae) are associated with nectar- but not pollen-collecting pollinators.
Article in Annals of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsPlant-pollinator interactions span a continuum from strict specialization to generalization and most flowers are visited by more than a single functional group of pollinators. However, one functional group might be more efficient than the others and thus exert stronger selective pressure on floral traits. In this study we aim to identify the evolutionary drivers of floral syndromes in the genus Aquilegia.
methodsWe analyse floral syndromes using multivariate statistics, morphospace analyses as well as a machine learning approach (random forests), testing for the association between floral traits and documented pollinators for 28 Aquilegia species. In particular, we test whether pollen-collecting pollinators (small bees, large bees, syrphid flies) and nectar-collecting pollinators (large bees, hummingbirds, hawkmoths) are associated with specific floral traits. Furthermore, we test whether mixed pollination systems are reflected in floral syndrome properties. KEY
resultsOur results indicate that floral syndromes in Aquilegia are shaped mainly by nectar-collecting pollinators (and not by pollen-collecting pollinators). Flowers pollinated by large bees are mostly pendent and short-spurred; hummingbird flowers are red, with constricted spurs and short petal blades; and hawkmoth flowers are erect with long and slender spurs. Flowers pollinated by two groups of nectar-collecting pollinators show syndromes corresponding to only one of their pollinator groups.
conclusionsDespite their ubiquity, we did not find cues for selection by any of the pollen-collecting pollinators. Nevertheless, selection for traits associated with pollen-collecting pollinators, such as openly accessible stamens and a contrasted yellow floral centre (almost always present in Aquilegia), cannot be ruled out. Floral syndromes in Aquilegia are associated with nectar-collecting pollinators only, perhaps because they are more efficient at pollinating, which remains to be tested in field experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.