ReviewmAbs2026
The making of multispecific immunoglobulins - a clinical perspective.
Review in mAbs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Rethinking Monospecific Antibody Therapy in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: Dual- and Multispecific Antibodies.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026Review
- Llama mRNA-LNP immunization enables rapid isolation of target specific nanobodies using cell-based panning.Antibody therapeutics · 2026Article
- IMGT-NC Engineered Variants of INN Therapeutic IG or Antibodies and Related IgSF Proteins (TR, FPIA and CPCA): Bridging Sequences, Structures and Functions for AI.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Engineering Protein-Based HIV Entry Inhibitors: Advances, Challenges, and Translational Strategies.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Protein engineering: status report.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2026Review
- Next-generation T cell engagers for cancer and autoimmune diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Engineering strategies and binding mechanisms of therapeutic anti-PD-1 antibodies approved by regulatory agencies globally.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past two decades, bi- and multispecific antibodies have emerged as a rapidly advancing class of therapeutic biologics, transforming oncology and immunotherapy. By simultaneously binding two or more distinct antigens or epitopes, these molecules achieve mechanisms of action beyond those of conventional monoclonal antibodies, including immune cell redirection, dual pathway modulation, and enhanced tissue selectivity. Bispecific and multispecific antibodies exhibit considerable structural diversity, encompassing a wide range of molecular architectures covering a steady growing 'zoo' of formats. The therapeutic success and diversity of molecules and formats is reflected in the 2021 revision of the international nonproprietary name system, which introduced the suffix - mig to denote multispecific immunoglobulins. In this review, we provide an overview of multispecific antibodies in clinical development, focusing on format, molecular design, and clinical status. In total, data for 501 multispecific antibodies were compiled and analyzed, identifying 112 different formats. Overall, this analysis highlights the rapid growth, enormous format diversity, and translational potential of multispecific antibodies. It underscores their emerging role as versatile therapeutics not only in oncology, but also in non-cancer indications, reflecting a field that continues to evolve rapidly in response to both scientific innovation and clinical needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.