Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41542753›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2026

ISUOG Consensus Statement on sonographic assessment of the endometrium: how to perform a gynecological ultrasound scan and report the findings.

T Van den Bosch, R Heremans, C Landolfo, E Epstein, F P G Leone, T Bourne, D Timmerman, Collaborators

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

T Van den Bosch *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6777-5036
R Heremans *Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4945-8867
C LandolfoDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9808-7957
E EpsteinDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
F P G LeoneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Sciences Institute Luigi Sacco, Milan, Italy.
T BourneDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
D TimmermanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Collaborators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID41542753
PMCPMC12865526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.