ArticleHippocampus2026
Hippocampal Signal Complexity Predicts Navigational Performance: Evidence From a Two-Week VR Training Program.
Article in Hippocampus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence from rodents has revealed that the hippocampus processes information in a graded manner along its long-axis, with anterior regions encoding coarse information and posterior regions encoding fine-grained information. During navigation tasks with humans, similar patterns have been shown, with granularity of representation and rate of signal varying along the long-axis. However, the stability of these signals and their relationship to navigational performance remain unclear. In this study, we conducted a 2-week training program where 26 participants (6 M; 20 F) learned to navigate through a novel city environment. We investigated inter-voxel similarity (IVS; a measure of representational granularity) and temporal auto-correlation (a measure of signal change) in the hippocampus. Specifically, we examined how these signals were influenced by navigational ability (stronger vs. weaker spatial learners), training session, and navigational dynamics. Our results suggested that stronger learners tended to exhibit an anterior-posterior distinction in IVS in the right hippocampus, whereas weaker learners showed less pronounced patterns. Additionally, lower general IVS levels in the hippocampus were linked to better early learning. These findings suggest that signal complexity in the hippocampus may play a role in successful navigation and that efficient organization of scales of representation could be beneficial for navigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.