SynthesisComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2026
Trends on Strategies for Mitigation of Antibiotic Residues in Milk and Dairy Products Based on Scientometric Analysis and Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Trends on Strategies for Mitigation of Antibiotic Residues in Milk and Dairy Products Based on Scientometric Analysis and Systematic Review.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The presence of antibiotic residues (ARs) in milk poses a significant challenge to public health and the dairy industry. This study presents the research trends on strategies to mitigate ARs in milk and dairy products, combining scientometric and systematic review approaches. Following the PRISMA guidelines, data from Web of Science, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Embase, AGRICOLA, and CAS Abstract yielded 49 original articles. Geographical analysis revealed a heterogeneous distribution, with Spain as the leading contributor. The analysis showed that heat treatment is the most studied mitigation strategy, reflecting its widespread industrial implementation. Crucially, a clear trend indicates the growth of emerging nonthermal technologies, such as pulsed electric field (PEF) and ozonation, driven by the need to preserve the nutritional and sensory attributes of milk. The most studied antibiotics belong to the tetracycline and penicillin classes, with oxytetracycline being most frequently investigated, followed by penicillin, tetracycline, ampicillin, chlortetracycline, cloxacillin, and amoxicillin. The findings confirm that no single strategy is universally effective. The results indicate that the future of ARs mitigation lies in the development of synergistic and combined approaches to achieve industrially viable, cost-effective protocols that preserve product quality. This study highlights the need for future research focused on selective technologies and the assessment of by-product toxicity, alongside the regulatory aspects for the application of these technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.