ArticleNIHR open research2025
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of a community wellbeing service for black, Asian and minoritised young people.
Article in NIHR open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Young people from minoritised ethnic backgrounds experience greater mental health needs and face greater challenges when accessing mental health support. We evaluated implementation of a new mental wellbeing service for minoritised young people in an urban youth centre. Methods: We evaluated the service during its first 12 months of implementation. We held twelve interviews with four service practitioners and three paired interviews with six young people. Fieldnotes were taken and used to contextualise interview data. Practitioners recorded young people's attendance. Qualitative data were analysed thematically. Attendance data were analysed descriptively. Results: The service included Four components: a weekly two-hour session with mental health practitioners in the youth centre, opportunistic wellbeing conversations and activities, mentoring, and referrals to therapeutic support. It was developed iteratively to allow time for relationships between practitioners and with young people to develop and for intervention to be tailored to the setting.Implementation was facilitated by the setting's positive influence, practitioners' lived experience, iterative development of the service, and establishing trusting relationships. Barriers included the informal nature of activities, slow service implementation, and young people's inconsistent attendance and reluctance to engage with the service. 94 young people attended at least one session. Conclusion: Successful implementation of wellbeing services in community settings for minoritised young people can be affected by the informal and relaxed nature of the setting and the activities delivered, and the extent to which young people are willing to engage. Additionally, it requires relationship building and flexibility in delivery and pace. Future development and evaluation of similar services should consider these requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.