ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Phecoder: semantic retrieval for auditing and expanding ICD-based phenotypes in EHR biobanks.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Electronic health record (EHR)-based phenotyping underpins genome-wide association studies, yet current ICD-code phenotypes rely heavily on manually curated lists such as Phecodes. These definitions are labour-intensive to maintain, inherently subjective, and may omit clinically relevant diagnostic codes, reducing study power. Advances in text embedding models offer an opportunity to automate and standardize ICD-based phenotype construction. Methods: We developed Phecoder, an ensemble of pre-trained text embedding models that rank ICD codes by similarity from free-text phenotype descriptions. Nine embedding models and multiple unsupervised ensemble rank-fusion methods were evaluated against 1,125 PhecodeX phenotypes. Retrieval performance was assessed using recall and average precision at top-100 (R@100, AP@100). Expert clinical review of six neuropsychiatric phenotypes was undertaken to identify relevant ICD codes absent from PhecodeX. Cohort sizes under these new definitions were compared with PhecodeX across sex and ancestry strata in the Million Veteran Program (MVP). Findings: Among individual models, Qwen3-Embedding-4B achieved the highest median recall (R@100 = 0.86). Ensemble rank-fusion further improved R@100 by 3%, and median AP@100 by 8%. Expert review confirmed that Phecoder retrieved additional clinically relevant ICD codes beyond PhecodeX across all six neuropsychiatric case studies. Median potential case expansion increased by 200%, with 700% increases for bipolar disorder and 2000% increase for eating disorders. Interpretation: Manually defining ICD phenotypes has been critiqued as subjective, potentially yielding overly restrictive definitions that miss relevant codes. To address this issue, Phecoder algorithmically identifies relevant codes for ICD-based phenotyping. Phecoder extracts relevant ICD codes to expand the potential case pool across different demographic groups. Phecoder is easily applicable to future ICD-code releases and across different ICD coding versions that are used in different countries. Taken together, Phecoder has the potential to improve reproducibility in EHR data research. Funding: This research was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs MVP (MVP-000, MVP-076 and MVP-096). The MVP is supported by the Office of Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs. The authors thank the MVP staff, researchers, and volunteers, who have contributed to MVP, and especially who previously served their country in the military and now generously agreed to enroll in the study (see mvp.va.gov for more information). The contents do not represent the views of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government. This study was supported by the Veterans Affairs Merit grants: BX006500 (to D.B.) and BX004189 (to P.R.). This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH): R01MH125246 (to P.R.), R01AG078657 (to G.V.), R01AG067025 (to P.R.), and U24AG087563 (to P.R.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.