ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Global patterns of natural selection inferred using ancient DNA.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ancient DNA has revolutionized our understanding of human history, and is now yielding important insights into evolution and natural selection. However, studies of selection using ancient DNA have largely been limited to Europe, excluding populations in other parts of the world. While many selective pressures were local to specific populations others, for example those related to the development of agriculture, may have been universal. By studying a broader range of global populations, we can identify examples of local adaption but also more general principles of adaptation to climatic, social and technological changes. We therefore leverage ancient DNA to test for selection in 7244 individuals from 13 ancient and 19 present-day populations across five regions: Europe, East Asia, South Asia, Africa and the Americas. In each region, we tested for selection using multiple approaches that account for complex demographic histories. We identify 31 genome-wide significant signals of selection, including both known and novel loci. We find a high degree of shared signal across regions, suggesting extensive parallel or shared adaptation. Using a novel admixture-aware time series method, we find that the strength of selection on many variants changed over time, for example decreasing selection at
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.