Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41542465›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

A unified framework enables accessible deployment and comprehensive benchmarking of single-cell foundation models.

Siyu Hou, Penghui Yang, Wenjing Ma, Jade Xiaoqing Wang, Xiang Zhou

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Siyu HouDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, 06511, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5300-6495
Penghui YangDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, 06511, CT, USA.
Wenjing MaDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 48109, MI, USA.
Jade Xiaoqing WangDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Xiang ZhouDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, 06511, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4331-7599

Funding

Statistical Methods for Modeling Polygenic Architecture in Association and Re-sequencing StudiesR01HG009124 · NHGRI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Xiang Zhou · 2017 to 2026
$3.0M
New directions in single cell genomics method developmentR01GM126553 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Mengjie Chen · 2017 to 2026
$2.9M
Developing new computational tools for spatial transcriptomics dataR01HG011883 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CHEN, MENGJIE, ZHOU, XIANG · 2021 to 2024
$1.5M
DMS/NIGMS 2: Advanced Statistical Methods for Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics StudiesR01GM144960 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZHOU, XIANG · 2021 to 2024
$1.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG009124NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011883NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126553NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM144960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent years have seen rapid growth in single-cell foundation models (scFMs), raising expectations for transformative advances in genomic data analysis. However, their adoption has been hindered by inconsistent performance across datasets, fragmented software ecosystems, high technical barriers, and the lack of best practices established through systematic, reproducible benchmarks. Here we present a unified, extensible, and fully automated computational framework that standardizes the execution, evaluation, and extension of diverse scFMs. The framework harmonizes software environments, eliminates manual configuration, and enables large-scale, reproducible evaluation across heterogeneous datasets and training regimes. Leveraging this infrastructure, we systematically benchmark thirteen foundation models alongside classical baselines across more than fifty datasets under zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning settings. We show that pretrained embeddings capture biologically meaningful structure and provide clear advantages in low-label and transfer-learning scenarios, while classical PCA approach remains competitive or even preferable in others. Together, this work lowers technical barriers, delivers best practices, and establishes a transparent and reproducible standard for community-wide evaluation, accelerating rigorous development and adoption of scFMs.

Indexed as

benchmarkfoundation modelscFMscLLMsingle-cell

Identifiers

PMID41542465
PMCPMC12803055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.