Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Tom V CoopmansCenter for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4801-5530
Stan L W DriessensCenter for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0008-6742-2482
Anna A GalakhovaCenter for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5538-0624
Tim S HeistekCenter for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4233-8902
Eline J MertensCenter for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5174-0306
Verjinia D MetodievaCenter for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1942-5140
Miranda R MooreCenter for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0006-8000-6366
Boudewijn LelieveldtDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8269-7603
Gábor TamásDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy, and Neuroscience, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-7905-6001
Huibert D MansvelderCenter for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1365-5340
Natalia A GoriounovaCenter for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5917-983X
Christiaan P J de KockCenter for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6697-0179
Nikolai C DembrowDepartment of Neurobiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.ORCID 0000-0002-7699-6591
Functionally guided adult whole brain cell atlas in human and NHPUM1MH130981 · NIMH · ALLEN INSTITUTE · PI Ed Lein, Hongkui Zeng · 2022 to 2026
$91.9M
A multimodal atlas of human brain cell typesU01MH114812 · NIMH · ALLEN INSTITUTE · PI LEIN, ED · 2017 to 2021
$19.2M
BRAIN CONNECTS: PatchLink, scalable tools for integrating connectomes, projectomes, and transcriptomesU01NS132267 · NINDS · ALLEN INSTITUTE · PI JARSKY, TIM M, SORENSEN, STACI A · 2023 to 2025
$5.7M
Multimodal analysis of primate infragranular pyramidal neurons and their modulationR01NS123959 · NINDS · ALLEN INSTITUTE · PI DEMBROW, NIKOLAI C, KALMBACH, BRIAN E. · 2021 to 2025
The human neocortex underlies higher cognition and is the engine of complex thought. Yet our understanding of its neuronal diversity is limited by sparse access to tissue, inconsistent sampling across studies, and a lack of multiple modality data. Although single-cell transcriptomic taxonomies are an important framework for characterizing cell type diversity, transcriptomic information alone cannot reveal the cellular properties that define neuronal computations. To address this, we performed Patch-seq, a method for collecting Morphology, Electrophysiology, and Transcriptomic data from a single neuron. We focused on glutamatergic, neocortical, excitatory neurons, the principal long-range projecting neurons of the cortex, and systematically integrated their morphoelectric features with transcriptomic identity. In combination with spatial transcriptomic data, we interrogated 39 of 42 transcriptomically-defined neuron types with a layer-centric perspective. Morphoelectric properties, such as cortical depth, apical dendrite structure, and excitability clearly distinguish transcriptomic subclasses and support many finer transcriptomic types. Morphoelectric properties are influenced by spatial location in supragranular layers, while deeper layers exhibit greater heterogeneity. Cross-species comparisons reveal conserved subclass organization but pronounced differences in apical dendrite arborization between mouse and human, and surprising similarities between human and macaque. Together, these datasets provide a unified multimodal reference that advances our understanding of human cortical circuitry and establishes a foundation for experimental and computational studies of human brain function and disease.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Human Neocortical Glutamatergic Neurons Revealed Through Multimodal Profiling. · full record | OpenQuestion