ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Global context rapidly shapes sensory responses in V1.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Context modulates sensory processing in the cerebral cortex by suppressing responses to expected stimuli and enhancing responses to unexpected ones. Recent proposals argue that early sensory areas such as primary visual cortex (V1) are shaped only by local context, including recent stimulus history, whereas modulation by global context, such as learned temporal structure, is present exclusively in higher cortical areas. This view is incompatible with predictive coding theories. To directly dissociate local and global contextual influences, we used a global/local oddball paradigm in which mice viewed five-item sequences. Across conditions, sequence structure was held constant while stimulus identity and predictability were selectively manipulated, allowing the isolation of response modulations due to local deviance, global expectation, and stimulus repetition independently. In the canonical sequence (AAAA-B), B is locally deviant but globally predictable. Using two-photon calcium imaging and LFP recordings in mouse V1, we found that global predictability abolished context modulation: responses to B were equivalent to those evoked by a random sequence control (e.g., CDEAB). This effect emerged rapidly, after only <10 sequence repetitions, demonstrating fast learning of global structure. When the stimulus was globally deviant, either by replacing B with a novel stimulus (AAAA-C) or by presenting B unpredictably in a standard oddball paradigm, V1 exhibited robust response enhancement. These effects required feedback from anterior cingulate area (ACa), establishing a causal role for higher cortical circuits in conveying global predictions to V1. Strikingly, when an additional A replaced B (AAAA-A), responses were strongly suppressed despite global deviance, indicating that stimulus-specific adaptation may constrain the expression of global prediction error signals in early sensory cortex.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.