ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Secondary Forest Conversion Into Betel Nut Plantations Reduces Soil Water Retention by Altering Soil Properties.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Secondary Forest Conversion Into Betel Nut Plantations Reduces Soil Water Retention by Altering Soil Properties.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Betel nut plantations have rapidly expanded in recent decades owing to their considerable economic benefits, resulting in a significant reduction of tropical secondary rainforests, which has had substantial impacts on soil hydrological properties. However, few studies have investigated the effects of forest conversion on these properties. In this study, soil samples from secondary forests (SF) and betel nut plantations (BP) were collected to assess soil physicochemical and hydrological properties. The results showed significantly higher topsoil (0-10 cm) water content and saturated water-holding capacity in SF than in BP. However, the opposite pattern was observed in the subsurface soil layer (20-60 cm). Similarly, the 0-10 cm soil layer showed higher capillary water capacity and field capacity in SF than in BP, but this trend was reversed in the 10-60 cm soil layer. Additionally, the conversion of forests into betel nut plantations led to a reduction in saturated hydraulic conductivity. The soil hydrological properties were significantly affected by land-use change through alterations in soil properties. We found that the soil nutrient content in BP was much lower than that in SF. Besides, soil capillary porosity played a role in influencing soil water retention, accounting for 32.03% of the variation, followed by total porosity (27.04%) and soil bulk density (26.5%), whereas the soil particle composition also had a resistance to soil degradation effect on soil water retention. Together, the conversion of secondary forest into betel nut plantations not only led to soil degradation, but also has negative effects on soil water retention capacity by reducing soil porosity and increasing soil bulk density. These findings provide important insights for the management of agroecological systems in tropical regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.