ArticleGenetics in medicine open2025
An evaluation of genetic predisposition to congenital anomalies and pediatric cancer supports
Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cancer risk in children with congenital anomalies.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Although congenital anomalies are among the strongest risk factors for developing pediatric cancer, the genetic underpinnings remain unclear. Therefore, we evaluated germline susceptibility in children with congenital anomalies and cancer. Methods: Through the Genetic Overlap Between Anomalies and Cancer in Kids Study, we recruited 47 participants with anomalies and cancer, along with their biological families. Genome sequencing was performed, focusing on single-nucleotide variants, indels, and structural variants. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics classification. Results: We identified pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 23.4% (11 of 47) of participants. These variants encompassed (1) 4 genes associated with both anomalies and cancer ( Conclusion: This study demonstrates a molecular diagnostic yield of 23.4% in participants with both anomalies and cancer. Additionally, the findings further implicate the role of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.