ArticlePalliative care and social practice2026
Development and pilot evaluation of a Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care Training program for nurses in Cameroon.
Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is a growing need for psychosocial oncology and palliative care training among nurses in Cameroon and other low-resource settings, where formal education in these domains remains limited. The Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care Training (POPCaT) program was developed to address this gap by providing a blended, contextually relevant training to nurses working in some healthcare settings in Cameroon. Objective: To evaluate the implementation, outcomes, and participant experiences of the POPCaT training pilot delivered across six health facilities in Cameroon. Methods: This was a pilot evaluation conducted immediately following a 4-day intensive POPCaT training. The course combined didactic lectures, interactive group work, clinical case discussions, role-plays, and a supervised visit to a palliative care unit. Fifty-two nurses purposively selected from six health facilities participated in the training, and 48 voluntarily completed the post-training evaluation. Quantitative data were collected via a structured survey containing closed-ended Likert scale questions assessing course satisfaction, content relevance, learning outcomes, and likelihood of practice implementation. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses. Qualitative data were collected through open-ended questions exploring motivations, course experiences, perceived strengths, limitations, and post-course intentions. Thematic analysis was applied to analyze open-text responses. Results: Participants were mostly female (83.3%) with a mean age of 38.2 years and varying levels of clinical experience. Most (64.5%) held a nursing diploma, while only 31.3% had prior oncology training. Overall course satisfaction was high, with 77.1% rating the program as "very good" and 93.8% reporting a strong likelihood to implement learning in practice. Participants praised the course content, relevance, interactive methods, and facilitator expertise. Key strengths included clinical exposure, bilingual delivery, and group learning. Areas for improvement included calls for expanded content on breaking bad news, cultural and spiritual care, sexuality, survivorship, and practical service implementation. Conclusion: The POPCaT training was positively received, enhanced nurses' confidence and knowledge, and generated actionable post-course plans across individual, clinical, and institutional levels. Findings support the relevance and scalability of this model for strengthening palliative and psychosocial oncology care in low-resource settings. Future iterations should incorporate suggested enhancements and explore long-term impacts on practice and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.