ArticleCureus2026
Surgical and Medical Acute Response Training (SMART) Programme: Improving Preparedness Amongst Newly Qualified Doctors to Manage Clinical Emergencies.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Medical school curricula in the United Kingdom (UK) have been reported to inadequately prepare newly qualified doctors to manage medical emergencies. Near-peer practice has been proposed to enhance emergency medical training. This study describes the development of a training session to improve the knowledge and confidence of newly qualified doctors to manage medical emergencies. Methods A near-peer, interactive training session was developed to support newly qualified doctors in managing medical emergency scenarios. The Surgical and Medical Acute Response Training (SMART) session was delivered to newly qualified doctors in the induction week prior to their first clinical placements, which included medicine, surgery, psychiatry, and paediatrics. Pre-session and post-session questionnaires were used to assess the self-reported preparedness of newly qualified doctors to manage medical emergencies. Rank biserial correlation was used to estimate effect sizes. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to identify statistically significant differences in ordinal data between the pre-session and post-session questionnaire responses. Results Forty newly qualified doctors attended the SMART session, all of whom completed the pre-session questionnaire (response rate = 100%). Thirty-four participants (85%) completed the post-session questionnaire. Thirty participants (75%) reported exposure to simulation training during their undergraduate training. Seven (17.5%) reported that they considered their undergraduate medical training had prepared them to lead medical emergencies. In the pre-session questionnaire, participants indicated the highest confidence in completing airway, breathing, circulation, disability, and exposure (A-E) assessments and situation, background, assessment, and recommendation (SBAR) handovers. The lowest confidence was reported for determining treatment escalation plans. In the post-session questionnaire, a significant and large positive effect was observed in multiple items relating to awareness of medical emergency teams (METs) and roles of allied health professionals, confidence in leading METs, and clinical management of acute scenarios. No statistically significant effect on confidence in completing an A-E assessment was identified. Conclusions This study revealed that newly qualified doctors report reduced confidence across several aspects of managing medical emergencies. Participants reported an increase in confidence in managing acute medical emergencies after participating in the near-peer interactive training session. Clinical educators may consider implementing the SMART session to support newly qualified doctors at the beginning of their post-graduate careers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.