Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41542289›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Diagnostic Applications of Point‑of‑Care Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine: A Narrative Review.

Yash Sharma, Babajide Obidigbo, Naomi P

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yash SharmaTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, GBR.
Babajide ObidigboOrthopaedics and Trauma, London Northwest University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, GBR.
Naomi PObstetrics and Gynaecology, York University, York, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Point‑of‑care ultrasound (POCUS) has become an integral diagnostic tool in emergency medicine, providing rapid bedside imaging that supports timely clinical decision‑making in acutely ill and injured patients. This narrative review examines the diagnostic applications of POCUS in emergency department settings, with emphasis on trauma assessment, lung ultrasound, focused cardiac ultrasound, evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm, and early pregnancy complications. The literature review was conducted using PubMed to identify peer‑reviewed studies relevant to diagnostic POCUS use in emergency medicine. The reviewed evidence demonstrates that POCUS improves diagnostic accuracy, accelerates time to critical interventions, and enhances patient triage across a broad range of emergency presentations. Key diagnostic applications include the focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) and extended FAST examinations, evaluation of acute respiratory and cardiac conditions, rapid bedside identification of abdominal aortic aneurysm, and early detection of ectopic pregnancy. In summary, diagnostic POCUS represents a versatile, efficient, and clinically impactful modality that continues to enhance the delivery of emergency care.

Indexed as

emergency medical serviceemergency obstetric carepocus integrationtrauma imagingultrasound (u/s)

Identifiers

PMID41542289
PMCPMC12800864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.