Observational studyCardiovascular therapeutics2026
Low-Dose Mavacamten Initiation in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Real-World Study in China.
Observational study in Cardiovascular therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Low-Dose Mavacamten Initiation in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Real-World Study in China.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: To evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of low-dose (2.5 mg) mavacamten initiation in Chinese patients with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM). Methods and Results: This single-center observational study (Zhongshan Hospital, China; Oct 2024-Apr 2025) enrolled 72 symptomatic oHCM patients (NYHA II/III, LVEF ≥ 55%, resting/Valsalva-provoked LVOT gradient [LVOTG] ≥ 30 mmHg). All patients initiated mavacamten 2.5 mg once daily. Doses were adjusted at Weeks 4, 8, and 12 based on LVEF and LVOTG. Primary outcomes were changes in resting/provoked LVOTG, NT-proBNP, and NYHA class at Week 12. Safety outcomes included LVEF < 50%, cardiac hospitalization, and death.Significant reductions from baseline to Week 12 were observed: Resting LVOTG (52.4 ± 28.7 to 32.1 ± 23.1 mmHg, Conclusion: In this first Chinese real-world study, initiating mavacamten at 2.5 mg significantly improved haemodynamics (LVOTG), biomarkers (NT-proBNP), and functional status (NYHA) in oHCM patients over 12 weeks with an excellent safety profile. Greater haemodynamic efficacy was observed in classic HCM and high-baseline-gradient patients. Escalation to 5 mg provided additional benefit. Mavacamten is an effective and safe therapy for oHCM in this Asian population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.