ArticleFrontiers in stroke2024
Exoskeleton-assisted training to enhance lower limb motor recovery in subacute stroke: does timing matter? A pilot randomized trial.
Article in Frontiers in stroke, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03727919 (A Temporal Analysis of the Robustness of Hemiplegic Gait and Standing Balance Early After sTroke - the TARGET Research Project), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Temporal Analysis of the Robustness of Hemiplegic Gait and Standing Balance Early After sTroke - the TARGET Research Project
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Deep Learning Models Optimization for Gait Phase Identification from EMG Data During Exoskeleton-Assisted Walking.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lower limb motor recovery, including abnormal muscle synergies, occurs mainly within the first 5-8 weeks after a stroke. This suggests the importance of delivering impairment-focused therapies, such as therapeutic robots that promote symmetric gait, during this time-sensitive period, following the principle of "the earlier, the better." Objective: First, to compare early robotic training (ERT) with usual care (UC) against UC alone on restoring intralimb muscle synergies and interlimb symmetry during functional tasks; Second, to investigate whether ERT is superior to delayed robotic training (DRT) starting after the proposed time-sensitive period. Methods: This observer-blinded, randomized pilot trial with crossover design involved 19 nonambulatory adults included within 14 days poststroke. Those allocated to ERT ( Results: A trend toward earlier reacquisition of walking independence favoring ERT with UC over UC was not accompanied by differences in FM-LE, WBA, or DCA (first objective). Thereafter, DRT with UC did not yield any significant changes relative to UC, such that no between-group differences were found favoring restorative effects of ERT over DRT (second objective). Conclusion: This pilot trial shows the feasibility of investigating a wearable exoskeleton as an adjunct therapy in subacute stroke. Nevertheless, our preliminary findings suggest that motor recovery of lower limb muscle synergies was not enhanced by 4 weeks of robotic training to reduce compensations with the less-affected side, irrespective of the timing of application. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03727919.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.