Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41542275›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in stroke2024

Exoskeleton-assisted training to enhance lower limb motor recovery in subacute stroke: does timing matter? A pilot randomized trial.

Jonas Schröder, Laetitia Yperzeele, Elissa Embrechts, Renata Loureiro-Chaves, Ann Hallemans, Christophe Lafosse, Steven Truijen, Gert Kwakkel, Wim Saeys

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in stroke, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03727919 (A Temporal Analysis of the Robustness of Hemiplegic Gait and Standing Balance Early After sTroke - the TARGET Research Project), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03727919 nacompletednot on this map

A Temporal Analysis of the Robustness of Hemiplegic Gait and Standing Balance Early After sTroke - the TARGET Research Project

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversiteit AntwerpenRan2018 to 2022Enrolled19ConditionsStroke, Paresis, Gait, HemiplegicArmsExoskeleton-assisted gait training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jonas SchröderResearch Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Laetitia YperzeeleNeurovascular Center Antwerp and Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Elissa EmbrechtsResearch Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Renata Loureiro-ChavesResearch Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Ann HallemansResearch Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Christophe LafosseRevArte Rehabilitation Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Steven TruijenResearch Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Gert KwakkelDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences-Rehabilitation and Development, Amsterdam Neurosciences-Neurovascular Disorders, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Wim SaeysResearch Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lower limb motor recovery, including abnormal muscle synergies, occurs mainly within the first 5-8 weeks after a stroke. This suggests the importance of delivering impairment-focused therapies, such as therapeutic robots that promote symmetric gait, during this time-sensitive period, following the principle of "the earlier, the better." Objective: First, to compare early robotic training (ERT) with usual care (UC) against UC alone on restoring intralimb muscle synergies and interlimb symmetry during functional tasks; Second, to investigate whether ERT is superior to delayed robotic training (DRT) starting after the proposed time-sensitive period. Methods: This observer-blinded, randomized pilot trial with crossover design involved 19 nonambulatory adults included within 14 days poststroke. Those allocated to ERT ( Results: A trend toward earlier reacquisition of walking independence favoring ERT with UC over UC was not accompanied by differences in FM-LE, WBA, or DCA (first objective). Thereafter, DRT with UC did not yield any significant changes relative to UC, such that no between-group differences were found favoring restorative effects of ERT over DRT (second objective). Conclusion: This pilot trial shows the feasibility of investigating a wearable exoskeleton as an adjunct therapy in subacute stroke. Nevertheless, our preliminary findings suggest that motor recovery of lower limb muscle synergies was not enhanced by 4 weeks of robotic training to reduce compensations with the less-affected side, irrespective of the timing of application. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03727919.

Indexed as

clinical trialexoskeletonlower extremitypostural balanceroboticsstrokewalking

Identifiers

PMID41542275
PMCPMC12802626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.