Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41542261›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in stroke2024

The feasibility of health professional student delivered social visits for stroke survivors with loneliness.

Jason Burnett, Jordan Broussard, Bronson Ciavarra, Louisa Smitherman, Mary Li, Emma Thames, Sharon Zachariah, Grace Kim, Rachel Pijnnaken, Hannah Zeller and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in stroke, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jason BurnettMcGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Jordan BroussardInstitute for Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Bronson CiavarraMcGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Louisa SmithermanMcGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Mary LiMcGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Emma ThamesMcGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Sharon ZachariahMcGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Grace KimMcGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Rachel PijnnakenCizik School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Hannah ZellerCizik School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
John HalphenDepartment of Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Sean I SavitzInstitute for Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Namkee ChoiSteve Hicks School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Jennifer E S BeauchampInstitute for Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the feasibility of a social phone call program to address social isolation and loneliness in stroke survivors. Materials and methods: We paired 14 lonely community-living stroke survivors with 14 health professional students for 6-weekly unstructured social phone calls. Feasibility data and measures of social isolation, loneliness and other psychosocial metrics were collected pre- and post-intervention. Students journaled following each unstructured call to capture the informal conversation and their sentiments. Results: Sixty-two percent of the targeted sample was interested. Fourteen eligible and interested participants were enrolled. The 13 (93%) participants completing all calls and surveys were an average of 57 years old, 85% female, and 77% non-Hispanic white. At baseline, participants were highly lonely and moderately depressed. Participants disclosed physical and emotional challenges, previous valued employment, and enjoyment from the calls. Students reported enjoying the connections, learning about the struggles of aging-in-place after stroke, and valuing compassionate care for the stroke population. Conclusions: Knowledge gaps remain regarding effective social support interventions to provide continuity of care directed at managing social disconnection after stroke. A health professional student-delivered social phone call intervention with stroke survivors appears to be a feasible, in part, and encouraging approach for addressing social isolation and loneliness. Future trials require re-evaluation of eligibility criteria and strategies to boost enrollment before efficacy testing is conducted in a larger trial.

Indexed as

lonelinesssocial connectednesssocial isolation (SI)strokestudent-led

Identifiers

PMID41542261
PMCPMC12802625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.