ArticleFrontiers in stroke2024
Outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients with large-vessel occlusion and initial mild deficits.
Article in Frontiers in stroke, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endovascular treatment and clinical outcomes in minor ischemic stroke due to large-vessel disease: a retrospective study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Low NIHSS score in large vessel occlusion stroke: optimal treatment and clinical controversies.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The management of patients with initially mild acute ischemic stroke (AIS), defined by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores 0-5, remains ambiguous despite advances in stroke treatment. The early identification of patients likely to deteriorate is critical in preventing lasting disability. Aims: We investigated the frequency and early predictors of poor functional outcomes in AIS patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) and initial mild deficits. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study of consecutive AIS patients admitted to a single comprehensive stroke center between 2018 and 2021. The inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of AIS, an arrival NIHSS score of 0-5, imaging-confirmed LVO, and arrival within 24 h of the last-known-well time. The primary outcome was the change in the discharge-modified Rankin Score (ΔmRS) from baseline, categorized as 0-1 (stable outcome) or >1 (poor outcome). Early neurological deterioration was defined as a mean NIHSS score increase of >1 in the first 24-h period. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed. The mean daily NIHSS scores were compared between groups using an analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: Of 4,410 stroke admissions, 120 patients met the study inclusion criteria, with 71 (59.2%) patients having a ΔmRS of 0-1 and 49 (40.8%) patients having a ΔmRS of > 1. The mean arrival NIHSS score was similar between groups. However, the mean first-24-h NIHSS score was significantly higher in the poor outcome group vs. the stable outcome group (2.13 vs. 0.95, Conclusion: Poor outcomes occurred in a significant proportion of LVO patients with initial mild deficits. The only association was early neurological deterioration. To prevent poor outcomes, rapid identification of any clinical deterioration should prompt consideration of thrombectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.