ArticleHuman mutation2026
Integrative Multiscale Analysis Reveals EFNA1-Driven Immune Remodeling Promotes Colorectal Cancer Lymph Node Metastasis.
Article in Human mutation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-cell-marker-based subtyping and multi-level analyses uncover the prognostic effects, dysregulations and therapeutic indicative potential of an eight-gene signature in lung adenocarcinoma.Cancer cell international · 2026Article
- Integrative Multiscale Analysis Reveals EFNA1-Driven Immune Remodeling Promotes Colorectal Cancer Lymph Node Metastasis.Human mutation · 2026Article
- ScRNA-Seq Deciphers an Autocrine EFNA1-EPHA1 Loop That Reprograms the Microenvironment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nodal involvement constitutes a pivotal prognostic indicator in colorectal carcinoma, yet the transcriptional machinery governing lymphatic dissemination and tumor-microenvironment crosstalk remains poorly elucidated. Conventional bulk sequencing methodologies lack sufficient resolution to deconvolve functionally distinct malignant subclones that drive the metastatic cascade. Methods: We employed an integrative analytical framework combining tissue-level gene expression profiling from TCGA and GEO repositories with eight single-cell transcriptomic datasets comprising 266,995 individual cells. A phenotype-guided computational algorithm was implemented to delineate metastasis-driving malignant populations through correlating clinical parameters with cellular transcriptional profiles. Gene regulatory networks and transcription factor activity inference systematically decoded the molecular programs underlying metastatic phenotypes. Ligand-receptor pairing analysis mapped intercellular communication architectures between neoplastic cells and microenvironmental constituents. Experimental validation encompassed genetic perturbation studies, functional characterization assays, and pharmacological response evaluation in preclinical systems. Results: We discovered a phenotypically distinct malignant population exhibiting robust associations with lymph node involvement and adverse clinical outcomes across nine independent validation cohorts. Regulatory network dissection identified IRF9 as the master transcriptional orchestrator of this metastatic program through coordination of a discrete gene module. Relative to their nonmetastatic counterparts, these aggressive cells establish markedly expanded intercellular communication networks, characterized by prominent VEGF-driven angiogenic signaling to endothelial compartments and integrin-laminin-mediated adhesion with stromal elements. EFNA1 emerged as a key signaling mediator demonstrating preferential enrichment in this metastatic subset. Elevated EFNA1 levels correlated with progressive disease stages and microsatellite-stable subtypes while showing inverse relationships with PD-L1 expression and T cell infiltration density-suggesting a unique immunoevasion mechanism. Genetic ablation of Efna1 substantially impaired cellular proliferation, motility, and invasion capabilities, while simultaneously augmenting Linifanib sensitivity, indicating synergistic therapeutic potential. Conclusions: Our investigation reveals a transcriptionally defined malignant population under IRF9 control that orchestrates immunosuppressive microenvironmental reprogramming via EFNA1-mediated signaling networks. The EFNA1-Linifanib combination may represent a potential therapeutic approach to mitigate anti-angiogenic resistance and restrain metastatic progression in colorectal carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.