Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41542221›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026

Intraperitoneal and intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 and sintilimab as first-line treatment for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis: a single-arm phase 2 trial (DRAGON-09).

Hong Yuan, Sheng Lu, De-Bin Sun, Xue-Xin Yao, Wen-Tao Liu, Ya-Nan Zheng, Zi-Chen Hua, Zhen-Tian Ni, Chang-Yu He, Zhen-Qiang Wang and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Association of metabolic markers, inflammatory biomarkers, and sedentary time with comorbidities among cancer patients: Results from NHANES 2021-2023.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Welcoming 2026: Interplay of Mind and Body in Youth.Child psychiatry and human development · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Hong YuanDepartment of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Sheng LuDepartment of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
De-Bin SunGenecast Biotechnology Co. Ltd, Wuxi, China.
Xue-Xin YaoDepartment of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wen-Tao LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ya-Nan ZhengDepartment of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zi-Chen HuaDepartment of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhen-Tian NiDepartment of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chang-Yu HeDepartment of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhen-Qiang WangDepartment of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jiao ZhangGenecast Biotechnology Co. Ltd, Wuxi, China.
Di LiuGenecast Biotechnology Co. Ltd, Wuxi, China.
Cen JiangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chen LiDepartment of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jun ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Min YanDepartment of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhong-Yin YangDepartment of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Min ShiDepartment of Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zheng-Gang ZhuDepartment of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chao YanDepartment of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: First-line PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy has shown significant clinical benefit in metastatic gastric cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab and S-1 plus intraperitoneal and intravenous paclitaxel as first-line treatment for patients with gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis (GCPM), as well as exploratory predictive biomarker analysis. Methods: We conducted a single-arm, phase 2 trial at a single centre in China between Jan 1, 2022, and Dec 31, 2023. Patients with laparoscopically confirmed GCPM were treated with sintilimab (200 mg IV on D1), S-1 (40-60 mg orally twice a day for D1-14), and paclitaxel (20 mg/m Findings: 38 patients were included. The median progression-free survival was 14.6 months (95% CI: 10.8-not reached [NR]) and OS was 18.4 months (95% CI: 15.0-NR). The post-hoc analysis showed the objective response rate was 57.9% and disease control rate was 94.7%. The most common treatment-related adverse events were anemia, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase elevated, and leukopenia. Longitudinal analyses of plasma circulating tumor DNA showed that low baseline human genome equivalent was associated with favorable OS. Interpretation: First-line sintilimab and S-1 plus intraperitoneal and intravenous paclitaxel showed promising therapeutic efficacy in patients with GCPM. Funding: Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai, Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, National Science Foundation of China, and the Shanghai Hospital Development Center.

Indexed as

Gastric cancerPaclitaxelPeritoneal metastasisS-1Sintilimab

Identifiers

PMID41542221
PMCPMC12803849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.